Interview Evaluation Form

Complete during or right after the interview|One form per panelist, per candidate

Candidate Name

Your Name

Rating Guide — what each score means

Score	What it looks like
5 — Outstanding / Expert	Deep expertise and mastery. A comprehensive, well-structured answer with strong examples. Shows strategic thinking and the ability to anticipate challenges. Clearly exceeds what the role needs.
4 — Strong / Very good	Solid knowledge and application. Clear, relevant examples and sound reasoning. Not necessarily masterful, but reliably above average. Meets and often exceeds expectations.
3 — Basic / Fundamental	Foundational knowledge and skill. An adequate answer, though examples may be limited or surface-level. Understands the idea but not in much depth. Meets the minimum bar for the role.
2 — Beginning / Developing	Limited or partial understanding. Incomplete, vague, or unclear answers. Struggles to connect experience to what's being asked. Needs real growth to meet the role's expectations.
1 — Did not meet	Doesn't show understanding or application. Irrelevant, incorrect, or no real answer. No evidence of the needed skill. Does not meet expectations for the role.

Evaluation

Complete after the interview. These carry over the same categories used in the earlier candidate review, so ratings stay comparable across rounds.

Overall, this candidate's answers were relevant to what SNDdN needs in this role.

Overall Strengths (Optional)

Additional Comments (Optional)

Recommend moving this candidate forward

Yes No